第二委員会の再活性化における第1回非公式討議における古川書記官ステートメント
令和8年2月26日
Thank you, Mr. Chair,
Japan extends its sincere appreciation to the Bureau for convening this meeting and presenting a clear roadmap for the revitalization of the Second Committee. We welcome this structured approach and look forward to finalizing this work in a manner that complements and reinforces the discussions under Workstream 2 of the UN80 Initiative.
Japan believes that discussions on revitalization should be organized around two distinct but interrelated dimensions: process and content.
On the process, it is important for all Member States to openly share their interests and priorities at the outset. This would help clarify areas of divergence, areas of possible convergence, and issues that require further discussion, and thereby enable an efficient and constructive dialogue.
In this regard, Japan suggests that the Bureau consult closely with each regional group in order to draw out and reflect the diverse views of each Member State. This would help bring much-needed clarity on the Member States’ overall positions.
Turning to the content of revitalization, Japan would like to emphasize two points in particular.
First, on the rationalization of the number and frequency of resolutions, we believe there is room for review. We should consider whether the current cycle remains appropriate, taking into account related intergovernmental processes. It would be beneficial to discuss potential adjustments to adoption cycles among Member States, while avoiding negative implications for the substantive work of the Committee.
Second, on mandates, we should avoid duplication. Some existing mandates overlap, and new ones should be concise and clearly actionable. In line with the Workstream 2 discussions, both mandate creation and mandate implementation deserve reviews to ensure that revitalization enhances not only efficiency, but also effectiveness.
Mr. Chair,
Ultimately, the outcome of this process should be concrete and actionable, while appropriately reflecting the diversity of views across Member States.
Japan stands ready to contribute constructively to this important discussion and looks forward to continued engagement in the months ahead.
I thank you, Mr. Chair.
Japan extends its sincere appreciation to the Bureau for convening this meeting and presenting a clear roadmap for the revitalization of the Second Committee. We welcome this structured approach and look forward to finalizing this work in a manner that complements and reinforces the discussions under Workstream 2 of the UN80 Initiative.
Japan believes that discussions on revitalization should be organized around two distinct but interrelated dimensions: process and content.
On the process, it is important for all Member States to openly share their interests and priorities at the outset. This would help clarify areas of divergence, areas of possible convergence, and issues that require further discussion, and thereby enable an efficient and constructive dialogue.
In this regard, Japan suggests that the Bureau consult closely with each regional group in order to draw out and reflect the diverse views of each Member State. This would help bring much-needed clarity on the Member States’ overall positions.
Turning to the content of revitalization, Japan would like to emphasize two points in particular.
First, on the rationalization of the number and frequency of resolutions, we believe there is room for review. We should consider whether the current cycle remains appropriate, taking into account related intergovernmental processes. It would be beneficial to discuss potential adjustments to adoption cycles among Member States, while avoiding negative implications for the substantive work of the Committee.
Second, on mandates, we should avoid duplication. Some existing mandates overlap, and new ones should be concise and clearly actionable. In line with the Workstream 2 discussions, both mandate creation and mandate implementation deserve reviews to ensure that revitalization enhances not only efficiency, but also effectiveness.
Mr. Chair,
Ultimately, the outcome of this process should be concrete and actionable, while appropriately reflecting the diversity of views across Member States.
Japan stands ready to contribute constructively to this important discussion and looks forward to continued engagement in the months ahead.
I thank you, Mr. Chair.